Wednesday, December 2, 2009

not-ends 9

Sometimes i try to convince myself that that the difference between The Beatles and Poi Dog Pondering is just happenstance (and to a certain extent, it is). But then i remember that in terms of their greatest music, the Beatles became history's biggest act while still clearing their throat.

The biggest nonsense issue of our time is abortion. The two sides aren't even arguing about the same thing. And if we devoted all the resources we spend bickering to contraceptive research, we could eliminate the issue within a decade.

Reality TV? Has there ever been anything more unreal than humyn behavior when a TV camera is on?

Many are horrified that we spend over a third of our money on the military...but that's not even close to the record. George Washington's administration spent 80% of the budget on Indian-killin'.

Christians have no concept of how they're perceived as idiots by other religions. Even the Jews laugh at them...Jews know their own bible is moronic, but at least it's consistent.

The search for historical truth is necessary, and still doomed to failure. History is half events, and half intrigue. We don't even get the events straight.

Last year, 1 in 15 wimyn were so afraid of being alone, they paid a doctor to mutilate them.

A printer's error in 1631 resulted in Bibles that proclaimed, "Thou shalt commit adultery". Like we needed prompting.

If all wimyn decided to never again be beauty's slaves, do you know what would change between the sexes? Not one single thing.

Homophobia has been a tyranny of holocaustic proportions. "Homosexual" is a tyranny too. Humans are sexual. End of story.

TRUST NO ONE OVER FORTY...who doesn't have wrinkles. They ain't been laughing.

2 comments:

Max said...

In 1790 the entire federal government spent about 3% of GDP. We presently spend 4.8% of GDP on military alone.

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/GovernmentSpending.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States#Military_budget_and_total_US_federal_spending

Essentially, Washington wasn't spending a lot of money on killing Indians, he just wasn't spending money on the social programs that now dominate our national budget. Speaking of the search for historical truth...

wrob said...

Yes, i'm assuming my readers are smart enough to guess that there were no social programs back then.